Відео

To the very last question: I think it should be asked the other way round: "When the battlefield is not on the field anymore--- where ist it? Answer: Literally in EVERYBODIES body and brain!" But did anyone ask us?

😊😊😊😊😊😊

He is just a fisherman , try to get own position and do not care about nobody ..of course except himself

It seems that leaders want to compromise safety by appealing to ethics. Your enemy you don't crush completely won't.

😊

The Zionists who killed President Kennedy also killed Trump. A few weeks later, the President of Israel comes and speaks in the House of Representatives. And everyone applauds in the House. Don't be so stupid. Israelis never show their evil face. They present themselves as innocent and come and speak in the House of Representatives. An Israel that brutally murders innocent people and children cannot be a friend of America.

I would love to ask the Mrs. What she suggests to do you do when your wife hooks up with a very high person in DARPA and then DARPA spends the next Five years Ruining EVERY aspect of your life. I can tell you about alot of weapons they have because they have used alot of them on me. Its taken me five years to figure out who it was and have 1000% proof.

DARPA can vaccinate itself. We have doctors and human beings cannot be treated like pillows that you can keep on injecting only because it pays darpa ‘s bills

Ray suarez is so ridiculous....

Heard her interviewed on CoastAM but did not hear if she included HAARP in the book. Manipulation of the weather at giant array site outside Fairbanks Alaska, never a Congressional hearing or US "news" media report on it. I learned of it off Art Bell in the 90s when he interviewed Nick Begich on his book "Angels Don't Play This HAARP". Now why would they be deliberately altering the weather? They say they stopped but they did not dismantle the site. True quote LBJ 1962: "He who controls the weather controls the world".

If there are any spying pissants from DARPA scraping the comments here for dissenters and / or ideas and you'd like to finance a new AI comapny, get InQtel to give me a holla sometime and we can work something out. .... You likely have my phone number and email. I'll be free Mondays and Tuesdays, but you probably already knew that too.

🤯

it says experiments on virus etc. at 36:00 ?

Globalism and social media has shattered the world into little tribes. Good job.

Empire of Lies, Certified.

Don't give a toss.

Wow what a clarity this gentleman has.. spoe so effortlessly and fluently.. i am an indian but really admire his vocab.. clarity of thoughs and openness in expression

Nope.

Jacobsen is part of the program....sge is a sneaky snake

Children in areas patrolled by drone are not allowed to play outside in the sunshine but during heavy overcast can you go out and play lots.... So the movie don't look up had a different thing to look up at

Its always amazing to listen to this woman, yes listen, but is she really on the level or Darpa's level? How much bs is she feeding us through her excellent skills at explaining Darpa's mission? Surely Darpa is not allowing idiots to narrate for them so, Is this woman real or a piece of technology with implants built into her brain as a AI experiment ? I don't think she would even know that answer. She just seems to be too smart and very quick witted almost instant recall resembling a modern computer! You have to notice one uncanny ability she has,,, She has answers for any complex question that can be asked of her, And at times it seems her mannerisms exploit that she is actually listening to voices within her own head as if two brains are communicating independently to create suitable answers for the public! She might be an early product of AI. Is her glasses a heads up display ? Why all the adjustments touching her glasses and face at times, almost as though she is accessing answers touching different spots around her head. Her answers seem to overwhelm the interviewer with her vast knowledge!

If it scared Eisenhower in 1961, we are TOTALLY screwed.

If you create invasive technology to search for and control the enemy, the only question left is : WHO IS THE ENEMY?🎉

I could listen to this women reading the phone book.

We have anunaki tutors but so does the soviet's

She tells everything she's allowed to

Skynet is here

Prieš "partizanus" gali kovoti tik kiti " partizanai" iš kitos pusės ?.

Na taip GPS pakaitalas yra taip vadinam trianguliacija tarp mobilaus ryšio bokštus ir būtent dabartiniai telefonai taip dirba ne iš signalų iš kosmoso ir greičiausiais tai reikėtu vadinti TNA ( trianguliacijos navigacija) ?.

Regeneruoti Žmogaus galūnes greičiau įmanoma tik per genų inžineriją kaip tarkime suprasti kaip Žmonių žaizdos užgyja savaime, bet jei jei bandyti modefikuoti genus ar nepažeisi genų grandinę kur visi genai yra surišti tarpusavyje kaip ir smegenų neuronai .

Jei ginklams leis paties priimti sprendimus? reiškia, kad artėjama prie "Sky Net" rezultatų .

Reiškia, kad galima valdyti smegenys ir tuo pačiu Žmones kurie tiesiog nesupranta, kad kažkas juos valdo ? !.

Not doing particularly well at finding the terrorists among us…looking at you, Kevin Roberts.

Oi vey. The sheer number of batshit lunacy in this comment section is off the chain! 😂

Just because science is available - there needs to be a reality check.

36:29 “DARPA challenged itself in 2013 to break that model and it created 10 million H1N1 influenza viruses in one month.” Did Annie Jacobsen mean viruses or vaccines?

She never said one good thing about DARPA. She highlighted all the failures.

Did DARPA detect 9/11? If so, why didn't they do anything?

DARPA is at least 50 years ahead of what we know now.

None of this would had even been possible without the invention of the electronic transister in 1946. Nothing. The man who invented it said shortly thereafter that it could lead to the end of the World. So what does man do? He puts electronics into nearly every aspect of human activity.

And here I thought metal gear solid was only a video game. 34 years old now and all this shit is coming to fruition.

You will never know anything current My son was in Special Forces . We went for a family day. They showed us some scary things that special forces was using . I said to my son they shouldn't be showing us those things. What is a parent took pictures and gave them to people that shouldn't see them. He rolled his eyes and said " Mom everything you saw is obsolete!!" Whatever she's saying is no longer important or a secret.

If it's a big secret how does she get in and tell about it on You Tube?

Naca si Dia cele mai bune agentii

Lol yeah

Excellent Analysis, Deployed Worldwide Through My Deep Learning AI Research Library. Thank You

I’m part of some weird darpa program. It’s annoying . I need a lawyer . Hollywood is a piece of shit

The jews.

its 2024, is it better? I am not a robot.

Part three AS FAR AND IN REGARDS TO IT, ALL OF IT, WHATEVER ALL OR IT IS WITHIN EXISTENCE, A QUESTION FORMAT STRUCTURE IS USED ONLY TO FIND OUT THAT WHICH CAN NEVER BE KNOWN MEANING IN VERY PRACTICAL TERMS ABSOLUTE NOTHING. THIS IS THE VERY STRUCTURE OF A QUESTION AND IT'S ULTIMATE BEST USE OF. ANY OTHER POSSIBLE USES ARE AND IS TO BE CONSIDERED A LOW, VERY LOW, ALL THE WAY TO EXTREMELY LOW LEVEL OF LOGIC. With one having been equipped with freedom as a fundamental to existence, a civilisation structure to back it in a standing, and a categorical refusal in applying capital punishment in general terms, whereas one having been equipped with freedom as relative to existence, a barbaric structure to back it in a standing, and a persisting instance in applying capital punishment in general terms as must... Then it goes without saying, one will always find vengeance as a necessary must, to be undertaken . Whereas one will always find vengeance as a necessary must, to be gotten rid of. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. In truly and to the literales serious fallowing of that, one will invoke, evoke, free, set free, tell, constrict, describe, explain, show, call, marry one thousand of if necessary, banish, convert, change etc etc the most extensive and most complex of structures known as demons and angels there is or can be. Whereas one will kill, and exterminate, torture, imprison etc etc all one is able and capable to, preferably all, leaving one with only one's last standing, until the next campaign. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. At such points one will reach the highest levels of intelligence simply by successfully calling any intelligent person stupid. Whereas one will reach the highest levels of intelligence simply by successfully calling any stupid person intelligent. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. Which clearly makes one civilisation and one barbarism on equal incouncilable magnificent terms. Bringing both parts at a highly contestable and vigorous dispute as to what is to be considered the fundamental of privacy. One considers a, or any enclosed space limited in access, the fundamentals of privacy. Whereas one considers walking at its most useful and general aplicabilities, the fundamentals of privacy. And as always with either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. Which clearly makes one civilisation and one barbarism on equal incouncilable magnificent terms. The difference then turns stark, sharp and strenuous in regards to how one and the other considers forgiveness, showing how extremely different can the same exact thing be. One knows forgiveness to be equally in form and independence on and within the themselves as a point (a), and any other correlating corresponding point (b), a point which by being independent of the other, can only be activated within the spectrum, meaning the system it belongs to, maintaining always a correlating corresponding independence equaled. Whereas the other knows forgiveness only as the part being independent within themselves, giving one a meaning of possession which can be offered and received. As consequence awarding it as and an independence. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. Which at such point the barbaric structure and that of civilisation one are equally powerful and totally different. Only under such a structure and level of structure can a very important difference be born in regards to either structure part, the barbaric one or the civilisation one, and this difference regards to suffering. One will in many cases if not all, under the rightly weight circumstances present one's suffering in all of its considered possible forms as a hospitality form of being or even technique. Whereas one unless, required through costume, tradition, ritual, or faith and religion, will only present one's suffering in all of it's considered possible forms under a similar way of rightly weight circumstances, as means and only means to a learning how not to suffer, in fact how to surpass it. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. It is at this point where the difference turns into a violence defendable if and when contested even as a simple argument, at minimum a anger filled animosity, as a present and a past or future memory, to be and be used upon. In being that both parts claim and by claiming consider the same structure as themselves..... Then one will always proceed in colonising only and only that which is not civilisational in structure. Meaning the very definition of the concept colony. Whereas one will always proceed in colonising everything including that which is already a civilisational in structure. Meaning no connection to the meaning of a colony. Which at the most probable definite, makes one civilisation, and one barbarism. In being on top hierarchically as an ascending and descending order or level at a given stance... One will only consider a question, any question in a direct corresponding corrolation to another question always. Whereas one will only consider a question, any question in a direct corresponding corrolation to a physical, understood, known as understood, sensed, or assumed as sensed being, always. Making one very prone to reality based illusions, whereas the other very prone to reality based hallucinations. (One requires a perpetual orbit, one requires a perpetual forward movement.) With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. In the form of a magnificent civilization and a magnificent barbarism. In being things can achieve such levels of heat at any possible combinations of physical states..... Then, one will get addicted to the other at possibly uncontrollable level's. Whereas as the other will blame and destroy the other as the fault and source of such possible depravity addictions. Impending in the process it's, and it's existence. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. In being that a question is to be considered low, very low all the way to extremely low level of logic.... both structures can and always begin through.... One considering a bridge only and only in terms of it existing or not. Whereas the other considering a bridge only and only in terms of passage or not. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. Making highly distinctive in one being civilisation and one being barbarism. Precisely because of that form and state of being... One considers intention a set of actions, not to be confused with actual being. Whereas the other considers intention a actual and literal state of being, giving rise to and enforcing the illusion of a perpetual set of actions, such as in the case of the act of a perpetual movement forward. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably, as the actual important difference. So impractically practical is the difference between the two, that in a proven fact it has taken me eleven days to grasp the one most powerful difference regarding the two, from the initial start of the writing itself, and the difference involves protest, protesting, a difference which has given rise to a whole religious structure, and consequently a way of living in the form of protestantism, formulating the very actual civilisations form as it stands, in a supposedly logical cooperation. One will use protest in order to protest against freedom itself, with the aim of achieving freedom. Whereas the other will never even think it to be possible, where an instance of free existence, requires any type of protest in order to achieve it, simply by and off the prior existence of the other. Making one see available and possible division in everything, consequently invoke, initiate, develop, maintain, enact, hold as memory, incite, and plant such available and possible division at a beneficial advantage or disadvantage, at any given available and possible moment. Whereas making the other see available and possible division only if and when faced with at a standing, any standing, even then ignoring it at the earliest possibility available, unless and only unless, one is set to purposely meet face on, such available and possible division. With either part claiming the exact same structure, justifiably. Making barbarism and civilization reach an impossible impasse, with either part standing unchangeable. Throughout this writing, letter by letter it can be read, and clearly seen that no question is presented, proposed or posed in any possible form, yet on equal terms, letter by letter it can be read and clearly be seen that a completely different level and degree of what are understood as questions is the writing interwoven with and within, so much so, that the very thought of presenting, proposing or posing a question, any question nullifies the very thought. Most importantly, the writing refers to one and one, or one and the other, yet if and when undertaken as a reading, it is impossible to know which is, with the caveat of in almost all instances, as a repeating loop, being only one point of reference, be it in the form of a human being, consciousness or any other system the very process can be abstractly or realistically applied to. Only reading these two last paragraphs, one will either lean towards the civilization structure or lean towards the barbaric structure within their very own self, with either case justifiably held as a standing, often almost always picking one or more answers to none existing questions, more importantly, completely unaware of the answers being that which each is, instead as that which each is not, a reality. © MIRI MAY 16/2024